Erickson Retirement
Communities
Development Proposal Follow Up
Given the level of community interest
and questions related to Erickson Retirement Communities'
development proposal, the Mayor and Board of Trustees requested
this additional information and clarification of specific
issues of concern.
Voting Impacts
While it is not possible to determine exactly how the future residents of the
Erickson Retirement Campus will vote on various matters, it is possible to
look at the voting results from similar facilities operated by Erickson Retirement
Communities (Charlestown and Oak Crest Village in Baltimore, Maryland) and
see how they compare with the general population.
| School Referendum - $71
million |
79% in favor |
78% in favor |
77% in favor |
| |
21% against |
22% against |
23% against |
| |
| Community College - $14 million |
71% in favor |
69% in favor |
68% in favor |
| |
29% against |
31% against |
32% against |
|
Anticipated Impact on Local Taxing Districts
As outlined in the Fact
Sheet section, approximately 14 percent of the campus (approximately 212
of the 1536 independent living units) will be located within Lincolnshire-Prairie
View School District 103. With an average occupancy of 1.25 persons per unit,
the retirement campus will create approximately 265 additional residents of voting
age within School District 103's boundaries which presently has 6,962 registered
voters.* Therefore, the retirement campus will comprise approximately 3.6 percent
of the overall School District 103. The entire campus will be located in Adlai
E. Stevenson School District 125, which currently has 32,693 registered voters.*
The anticipated population generation of the retirement campus of 2,286 residents
represents 6.5 percent of the total population served by School District 125.
It may also be helpful to examine precinct voting results within
our own community on similar referendum issues. At present, the
Village of Lincolnshire has 4,163 registered voters. According
to the 2000 Census, the Village had 4,465 residents of voting age,
987 of whom were 65 years and over.
| Precinct 233 |
46 votes in
favor (78%) |
13 votes opposed
(22%) |
| Precinct 234 |
165 votes
in favor (91%) |
17 votes opposed
(9%) |
| Precinct 250 |
145 votes
in favor (70%) |
63 votes opposed
(30%) |
| Precinct 251 |
431 votes
in favor (88%) |
59 votes opposed
(12%) |
| Precinct 252 |
291 votes
in favor (90%) |
31 votes opposed
(10%) |
| Precinct 253 |
218 votes
in favor (67%) |
26 votes opposed
(33%) |
| Precinct 257 |
107 votes
in favor (96%) |
5 votes opposed
( 4%) |
| Precinct 392 |
111 votes
in favor (85%) |
19 votes opposed
(15%) |
|
| 1995 School District
103 (Lincolnshire-Prairie View) |
| Precinct 233 |
137 in favor
(59%) |
96 opposed
(41%) |
| Precinct 234 |
251 in favor
(58%) |
179 opposed
(42%) |
| Precinct 250 |
77 in favor
(44%) |
100 opposed
(56%) |
| Precinct 251 |
137 in favor
(61%) |
96 opposed
(39%) |
| Precinct 252 |
343 in favor
(61%) |
217 opposed
(39%) |
| Precinct 253 |
224 in favor
(67%) |
109 opposed
(33%) |
| Precinct 257 |
130 in favor
(64%) |
74 opposed
(36%) |
| Precinct 233 |
110 in favor
(48%) |
118 opposed
(52%) |
| Precinct 234 |
230 in favor
(54%) |
198 opposed
(46%) |
| Precinct 250 |
48 in favor
(28%) |
127 opposed
(72%) |
| Precinct 251 |
296 in favor
(54%) |
252 opposed
(46%) |
| Precinct 252 |
224 in favor
(60%) |
148 opposed
(40%) |
| Precinct 253 |
209 in favor
(64%) |
119 opposed
(36%) |
| Precinct 257 |
119 in favor
(59%) |
83 opposed
(41%) |
|
| 2002 School District
125 (Adlai E. Stevenson High School) |
| Precinct 260 |
173 in favor
(63%) |
103 opposed
(37%) |
| Precinct 269 |
134 in favor
(61%) |
87 opposed
(39%) |
| Precinct 270 |
195 in favor
(65%) |
105 opposed
(35%) |
| Precinct 271 |
274 in favor
(74%) |
97 opposed
(26%) |
| Precinct 272 |
259 in favor
(78%) |
73 opposed
(22%) |
| Precinct 273 |
277 in favor
(73%) |
102 opposed
(27%) |
| Precinct 274 |
223 in favor
(63%) |
129 opposed
(37%) |
|
Impact on Median Home Value
Erickson Retirement Community relies upon a life-care contract financial model,
which does not include the sale of real estate to the campus residents. Therefore,
the average house sales price in Lincolnshire (presently estimated at $534,307)
will not be impacted by the proposed Continuing Care Retirement Campus. The
entire 92 acre campus will remain under single ownership-which translates to
one single tax bill and the property is assessed as an overall campus, rather
than unit by unit as with townhome or condominium developments. The residents
of the campus will never receive a property tax bill and will likely be unaware
of the significant tax revenues their campus provides to the larger community
and school districts serving Lincolnshire.
Clarification of Impact to Village Revenues
Last month's flyer included a complete breakdown of the Fiscal
and Economic Impact Analysis of the proposed Continuing Care Retirement
Campus. Questions have surfaced regarding the Net Revenues the Village will
realize, given that some of the fees and taxes are actually service-based or "pass-through" charges
that do not benefit the Village directly. While it was previously stated that
the Campus would generated $539,000 annually for the Village's Water and Sewer
Fund, it is estimated that $356,000 of these dollars would be paid to the City
of Highland Park to purchase water and to Lake County for sewerage disposal,
as well as other operational costs. Therefore, the Net Revenues realized by
the Village's Sewer and Water Fund annually would actually be $183,000. Fiscal
impact to other Village funds remain unchanged from that which was previously
presented:
| General Fund |
$355,800 |
|
Projected Annual Village
Costs attributable to Erickson Campus |
$49,900 |
| Motor Fuel Tax Fund |
$63,000 |
|
|
| E911 Fund |
$27,700 |
|
|
| Water & Sewer (adjusted) |
$183,000 |
|
|
|
| Annual Revenues |
$629,500 |
|
NET ANNUAL REVENUES |
$579,600 |
Also, in last month's Financial Summary, the one-time fees category
attributed Building Permit Fees, Building Review Fees and Site
Plan Development Fees in calculating the $7,018,900 in Nonrecurring
Revenue Sources. As these fees actually pay for services or are "passed-through" to
consultants, they have been removed from the tabulation of one-time
impact fees that would be associated with the Erickson Continuing
Care Retirement Campus. Similarly, the remaining Impact Fees were
re-examined to ensure they're accurately represented as Revenues
to the Village-and not simply used to pay for services or additional
administrative costs to the Village created by the Erickson development.
In general, Annexation Impact Fees ($500/acre) and Acreage Impact
Fees ($1,300) are assessed to new development within the Village
limits which is designed to pay for costs incurred by the Village,
area schools, fire district and library during the one year lag
before the property generates real estate taxes for the applicable
taxing districts. Given the overall size of this development project,
it is not anticipated that there will be residents residing upon
the Campus within the first year of construction. Therefore, the
Impact Fees listed below represent the Net Nonrecurring Revenues
associated with the development of the campus within the Village
of Lincolnshire limits.
| Annexation Fees |
$29,400 |
| Acreage Impact Fees |
$76,500 |
| Water Connection Fees |
$1,443,000 |
| Sewer Connection Fees |
$1,068,000 |
| Park Donation Fee |
$2,928,000 |
| NONRECURRING REVENUES |
$5,544,900 |
* Source: Lake County Clerk's Office. Figures current as of March
11, 2003.
** In 2001 Lake County's voting precinct boundaries were reconfigured. Therefore,
two separate Voting District maps are available: 1995-2001 and 2001-present. |